Families demand answers in disappearance cases

Mexico has refuted the findings of a United Nations committee on the country's enforced disappearances while welcoming input from a regional human rights body, raising questions about why the government is trying to discredit the committee's conclusions.

The Mexican government has questioned the UN Committee on Enforced Disappearances' (CED) report stating that disappearances are a widespread problem, and that enforced disappearances -- which are technically disappearances that involve security forces or other state officials -- have been met with almost total impunity, reported Milenio.

In the CED's report (pdf), which was concluded on February 11, the committee expressed its "concern over impunity in numerous cases of enforced disappearances, as evidenced by the almost complete lack of convictions for this crime."

The CED recommended that the Mexican government take a series of actions to address this problem, including creating a special prosecution unit in the Attorney General's Office, investigating officials and state agencies, and protecting individuals who report the crime. The CED also pushed for the Mexican government to recognize its competency to review individual cases.

In response, the Mexican government issued a press release stating that the committee's findings do not "adequately reflect the information presented or provide additional elements to reinforce the actions and commitments that have been undertaken to address the challenges mentioned," reported Eje Central.

In addition, Mexican Foreign Minister Jose Antonio Meade told La Jornada that there were inaccuracies in the CED's recommendations "which make us think the review wasn't as exhaustive as it should have been."

Meanwhile, Meade recently stated that the government would welcome the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights' (IACHR) input on the case involving 43 students who disappeared in Guerrero state last September.

InSight Crime Analysis

The Mexican government has a number of possible motives for rejecting the CED's findings and recommendations. For one, the CED's conclusions cast the Mexican government in an unfavorable light and undermine President Enrique Peña Nieto's campaign to improve the country's international image.

"The report is very critical of the Mexican government's handling of disappearances and enforced disappearances in the country at a time when the government is feeling already in the spotlight about this issue because of the 43 students who were enforced disappeared in September," Maureen Meyer, a Senior Associate for Mexico and Migrant Rights at the Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA), told InSight Crime. "I think they're feeling very much on the defensive right now."

Another point of contention is the CED's allegations that enforced disappearances are a widespread problem in Mexico, while the Mexican government maintains that many of the country's disappearances likely have other explanations. Jesus Perez, an independent investigator and expert on organized crime in Mexico, told InSight Crime that Mexico has likely rejected the CED's request to review individual cases because it could "shed 'too much' light on issues like the role of military forces in the disappearances of individuals supposedly linked to drug trafficking."

SEE ALSO: Mexico News and Profiles

On the other hand, although the IACHR can make recommendations about the government's general approach to disappearances, their investigation is focused mainly on the case of the 43 students (pdf). As Meyer told InSight Crime, the Mexican government has agreed to their involvement in this specific investigation at the request of the victims' families and human rights organizations.

The Mexican government may also wish to be seen as cooperative without wanting to actually air its dirty laundry in public. "The Mexican government has on several occasions on the one hand welcomed international scrutiny on their human rights situation and then when reports come out from rapporteurs or in this case a committee, kind of backtracked and worked to discredit the work," Meyer said. 

Investigations

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Prev Next

The FARC 1964-2002: From Ragged Rebellion to Military Machine

The FARC 1964-2002: From Ragged Rebellion to Military Machine

On May 27, 1964 up to one thousand Colombian soldiers, backed by fighter planes and helicopters, launched an assault against less than fifty guerrillas in the tiny community of Marquetalia. The aim of the operation was to stamp out once and for all the communist threat in...

The Reality of the FARC Peace Talks in Havana

The Reality of the FARC Peace Talks in Havana

If we are to believe the Colombian government, the question is not if, but rather when, an end to 50 years of civil conflict will be reached. Yet the promise of President Juan Manuel Santos that peace can be achieved before the end of 2014 is simply...

The FARC and the Drug Trade: Siamese Twins?

The FARC and the Drug Trade: Siamese Twins?

The FARC have always had a love-hate relationship with drugs. They love the money it brings, funds which have allowed them to survive and even threaten to topple the state at the end of the 1990s. They hate the corruption and stigma narcotics have also brought to...

The EPL and "Megateo": the Future of the FARC?

The EPL and "Megateo": the Future of the FARC?

While the demobilization of the M-19 rebel movement is perhaps the most famous guerrilla peace deal in Colombia's history, the Popular Liberation Army (Ejercito Popular de Liberacion – EPL), which demobilized in 1991, has been the largest insurgent force to make peace so far.

Could Colombia's FARC Rebels Break Apart?

Could Colombia's FARC Rebels Break Apart?

The possibility of ending nearly 50 years of civil conflict is being dangled before Colombia. While the vast majority of the Colombian public want to see peace, the enemies of the negotiations appear to be strong, and the risks inherent in the process are high.

Criminal Activities of the FARC and Rebel Earnings

Criminal Activities of the FARC and Rebel Earnings

The FARC engage in criminal activities to fund their struggle to overthrow the state. There is very little difference between the way they and the BACRIM raise money. The only difference is where the money goes: to fund a cause or for personal enrichment.

Possible Scenarios for the FARC's Fragmentation

Possible Scenarios for the FARC's Fragmentation

There are three possible scenarios for the fragmentation and/or criminalization of the FARC. The first could occur during peace talks, the second once an agreement is reached, and the last once the group has demobilized and elements of the rebels stay in, or return to, the field...

Criminalization of FARC Elements Inevitable

Criminalization of FARC Elements Inevitable

While there is no doubt that the FARC have only a tenuous control over some of their more remote fronts, there is no evidence of any overt dissident faction within the movement at the moment.

The FARC 2002-Present: Decapitation and Rebirth

The FARC 2002-Present: Decapitation and Rebirth

In August 2002, the guerrillas of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) greeted Colombia's new president with a mortar attack that killed 14 people during his inauguration. The attack was intended as a warning to the fiercely anti-FARC newcomer. But it became the opening salvo of...

Ivan Rios Bloc: the FARC's Most Vulnerable Fighting Division

Ivan Rios Bloc: the FARC's Most Vulnerable Fighting Division

When considering the possibilities that the FARC may break apart, the Ivan Rios Bloc is a helpful case study because it is perhaps the weakest of the FARC's divisions in terms of command and control, and therefore runs the highest risk of fragmentation and criminalization.