• Connect with us on Linkedin

Colombia’s BACRIM: Common Criminals or Actors in Armed Conflict?

  • Written by Mariel Perez-Santiago
  • Monday, 23 July 2012

Colombia's neo-paramilitary criminal gangs have been excluded from an initiative aimed at facilitating the demobilization of guerrilla groups, limiting the government's room for maneuver when dealing with these organizations and fueling a debate over whether they should be recognized as actors in the country's 48 year-old internal conflict.

Linkedin
Google +

On June 14, the Colombian Congress approved the historic Legal Framework for Peace, a mechanism that outlines the terms of a possible peace negotiation. Its primary beneficiaries are guerrilla groups, who are explicitly recognized as being actors in the armed conflict, and can receive lenient prison sentences if they turn themselves in.

But lawmakers explicitly excluded second-generation paramilitary groups, referred to as "bandas emergentes" (BACRIM), from the Framework on the basis that criminal gangs are not considered part of Colombia’s armed conflict, but are instead mere criminals. The BACRIM's exclusion from the Framework has been largely uncontested, mostly due to fears that anything resembling negotiations with the BACRIM would echo the government's flawed demobilization of the BACRIM's predecessors, paramilitary group the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC).

Still, the reasoning behind the peace bill has revived an old debate: should the BACRIM be recognized as actors in the armed conflict?

Many civil society organizations believe so. They claim that the current characterization of the groups leads to lax judicial processes for BACRIM members. In a recent report, the International Crisis Group (ICG) argued as much, citing the example of ERPAC's partial demobilization in 2011. The NGO characterized the move as a failure because when members of the armed group were treated in the courts as common criminals, this meant they received shorter prison sentences. The ERPAC's classification as a criminal organization meant that its members received less serious sentences for crimes such as “aggravated conspiracy,” and were not charged with serious human rights violations (including forced displacement and mass killings) that fit within the context of the armed conflict.

This issue goes beyond the ERPAC demobilization. The BACRIM's current classification as mere criminals also prevents victims of their crimes from benefiting from the 2011 Victims Law, which aims to restore land and provide reparations to victims of human rights violations. While the BACRIM cause forced displacement and commit many other violations covered under the Victims Law, the law explicitly excludes victims of violations committed outside the context of the armed conflict. As such, it could be argued that the current characterization of the BACRIM leaves victims without access to an important mechanism of justice.

While most analysts agree that there is solid evidence linking the BACRIM to the political aspect of the conflict, civil society is divided as to whether they should be officially recognized as actors, for fear of the consequences. Antonio Menendez de Zubillaga of the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights described it as “dangerous” to declare the BACRIM part of the armed conflict. “We do not want to enter into a peace agreement with criminals,” he stated.

Human Rights Watch (HRW)·expressed similar concerns about the potential for impunity if the BACRIM were to ever be included as actors in the armed conflict. HRW has been highly critical of the Legal Framework for Peace because of the possibility of impunity for human rights violations committed by guerrilla groups. The organization warns that if the BACRIM were to ever be recognized as actors in the armed conflict, they too could be granted a seat in potential peace negotiations, a development which would surely complicate the peace process.

If Colombia’s recent history is an accurate predictor, then concerns about the repercussions of a peace negotiation are justified. Human rights organizations cite the Justice and Peace process, a peace negotiation with the paramilitaries, as a partial or even complete failure. According to Federico Andreu of the Colombian Commission of Jurists, seven years of the Justice and Peace law have only resulted in courts sentencing seven paramilitaries, only three of which have been fully carried out. Given this, there is plenty of reason for the concerns that negotiations with the BACRIM would lead nowhere.

However, the BACRIM's role in the armed conflict is impossible to ignore. In a recent interview, Luis Alberto Bonilla of the Human Rights Ombudsman’s office explained that the victims of BACRIM violence who approach his office report the same human rights crimes that victims of paramilitary group the AUC reported during the 1990s and early 2000s, including forced displacement, targeted assassinations, and social control of communities. And unlike the BACRIM, the AUC were recognized as being part of the armed conflict. While Mr. Bonilla stressed that the Ombudsman’s office follows the terms of the current law regarding the BACRIM and their classification as groups outside the confliict, he insisted that “Reality reveals something else.”

Most human rights organizations even go as far as rejecting the name “BACRIM,’” choosing other labels that stress to varying degrees the links between the BACRIM and paramilitarism. These range from “neoparamilitaries” to “narcoparamilitaries,” and, in a blatant rejection of the government’s characterization, “paramilitaries.”

The reality is that the current classification is flawed. The types of human rights crimes that the BACRIM commit show continuity with the actions of paramilitaries, whose actions made them clear actors in the country’s internal conflict. Given this, it seems reasonable that the state should declare the BACRIM actors in the conflict. This would result in a clearer recognition of the gravity of the human rights crimes these groups commit and would grant the BACRIM's victims more complete access to mechanisms of justice.

But the government must be careful not to allow a repetition of history. Declaring the BACRIM actors in the armed conflict must be done in an effort to prioritize victims’ rights and should not result in the impunity that characterized the Justice and Peace process.

Ultimately, it remains to be seen whether the Colombian government will change its stance towards these groups, and if they do, how the development of a possible framework to combat and address them will balance victims’ rights to truth and justice with the very real possibility of a peace negotiation, one that could mean continued impunity.

Linkedin
Google +

---

What are your thoughts? Click here to send InSight Crime your comments.

We also encourage readers to copy and distribute our work for non-commercial purposes, provided that it is attributed to InSight Crime in the byline, with a link to the original at both the top and bottom of the article. Check the Creative Commons website for more details of how to share our work, and please send us an email if you use an article.

InSight Crime Search

The Complete Organized Crime Database on the Americas

InSight Crime Social

facebooktwittergooglelinkedin

InSight Crime Special Series

The Zetas in Nuevo Laredo

Los Zetas in Nuevo Laredo

After the capture of Zetas boss "Z40," Nuevo Laredo is bracing itself for the worst. This investigation breaks down what makes the city such an important trafficking corridor, and what it will take for the Zetas to maintain their grip on the city.

See entire series »

 

Uruguay's Marijuana Bill

Uruguay: Marijuana, Organized Crime and the Politics of Drugs

Uruguay is poised to become the first country on the planet to regulate the production, sale, and distribution of the drug.

See entire series »

El Salvador's Gang Truce

El Salvador's Gang Truce

The truce between El Salvador's two largest gangs -- the MS-13 and the Barrio 18 -- opens up new possibilities in how to deal with

See entire series »

Juarez After The War

Juarez After The War

As a bitter war between rival cartels grinds to an end, Ciudad Juarez has lost the title of world murder capital, and is moving towards something more like normality.

See entire series »

The Zetas And The Battle For Monterrey

The Zetas and the Battle for Monterrey

InSight Crime delves into the Zetas' battle for Mexico’s industrial capital, Monterrey, getting to the essence of a criminal gang that defies easy definition.

See entire series »

Slavery in Latin America

Slavery in Latin America

InSight Crime coordinated an investigation into modern slavery, looking at how Latin America’s criminal groups traffic human beings and force them to work as slaves.

See entire series »

FARC, Peace and Criminalization

FARC, Peace and Possible Criminalization

The possibility of ending nearly 50 years of civil conflict is being dangled before Colombia. While the vast majority of the Colombian public want to see peace, the enemies of the negotiations appear to be strong, and the risks inherent in the process are high.

See entire series »

Displacement in Latin America

Displacement in Latin America

InSight Crime coordinated an investigation into the new face of displacement in Latin America, where organized criminal groups are expanding and forcing people to flee.

See entire series »

Target: Migrants

Target: Migrants

The growth of organized crime in Mexico and Central America has led to an increase in violence and insecurity across the region, posing challenges to citizens, public security forces, and travelers.

See entire series »

Zetas in Guatemala

The Zetas in Guatemala

Mexico's Zetas have taken Guatemala by storm, and they are testing this country and the rest of the region: fail this test, and Central America sinks deeper into the abyss.

See entire series »

Most Read

Testimony Describes Zetas' Ties to Mexico Governor

Testimony Describes Zetas' Ties to Mexico Governor

Testimony from a US federal court provides more fuel for accusations that a former governor of Veracruz, Mexico, accepted cash from the Zetas, which was then part of the Gulf Cartel.

Read more

Mexico's Kidnapping Hotspots: The High-Risk States

Mexico's Kidnapping Hotspots: The High-Risk States

Kidnapping is the most troublesome security problem facing Mexico’s government, and a breakdown of kidnapping reports by a watchdog group reinforces the idea that only long-term institutional reform can cure it.

Read more

Colombia Houses Prisoners in Bogota Park Due to Overcrowding

Colombia Houses Prisoners in Bogota Park Due to Overcrowding

Close to 70 prisoners are being held in a park in Bogota, underscoring both the unsustainable levels of overcrowding in Colombia's detention centers and the government's failure to provide adequate solutions.

Read more

Latest Criminal Profile